Raw observations
What people said in archived public sources.
Raw titles are clues. They are not proof that a problem is big, common, important, or solvable.
That is why the project keeps observations, reviews, proposals, and validations separate.
The published list contains the strongest source-backed annoyances from the current release. It is a selection from the work, not a claim that every problem is solved.
General annoyances
Published annoyances
These made it through the current source check and Big Annoyance Test. They are the public list; the work behind each one stays linked below.
Browse general annoyances
Search the published general list by the kind of annoyance it describes.
No matches
Try a broader word or clear the filter.
City layer
City-specific annoyances
This is a separate collection for annoyances from specific cities. San Francisco is the first one. We can compare cities later; this section does not reclassify the general annoyance list.
The trail behind the list
How the list is made.
The homepage shows the published list. The repo keeps the work behind it: what was collected, what was grouped, what passed the source check and Big Annoyance Test, and what still needs formal problem review.
Candidate patterns
Repeated or promising burdens pulled out of the raw material.
Source and annoyance checks
We keep the evidence and apply the test before publishing a record.
Formal problem review
Published annoyances can later become reviewed problems, proposed fixes, and validations.